Rublev just won Bastad (250) tournament on clay, it's reasonable to conclude that clay is currently his strongest surface.
TenELOs surface live ratings for Rublev are:
A 20-point gap between clay and hard is not hugeβit suggests he's excellent on both surfaces. I wouldn't say he's much better on clay than hard, but I would say clay is his best surface right now.
His achievements also support that conclusion:
π 2 ATP Masters 1000 titles, both on clay:
π Multiple ATP clay titles, including Bastad twice.
π Strong clay results in 2026, including the Bastad title and a Barcelona final.
β Despite many deep runs on hard courts, he has never won a Masters 1000 on hard.
This is an interesting case where results and ratings agree:
One nuance is that hard courts remain extremely close. Rublev has won many ATP titles on hard courts and has historically accumulated a large share of his ranking points there. If his hard-court results improve later in the season, the Elo ratings could easily converge again or even switch.
So my assessment would be:
The fact that his highest Surface Elo (2721) aligns with the surface where he has won his only two Masters 1000 titles makes the conclusion particularly convincing. It's a case where both an objective rating system and his highest-level achievements point to the same answer.
In a Last 10 Hot Performances on Clay Rublev is #4... only Sinner, Alcaraz and Zverev are in front of him
No comments yet. Start the conversation!