Head 2 Head
Explore head-to-head records between players in men's professional tennis. Discover detailed rivalry stats and match outcomes from TenELOs
Federer Roger
Henman Tim
Head 2 Head
Explore head-to-head records between players in men's professional tennis. Discover detailed rivalry stats and match outcomes from TenELOs
Federer Roger
Henman Tim
1210
Overall Wins
416
789
Hard Wins
268
227
Clay Wins
63
194
Grass Wins
85
Match History (Federer 7 : Henman 6)
Hard
Clay
Grass
Date | Winner | Winner Overall Rating | Winner Surface ELO | Score | Loser | Loser Overall Rating | Loser Surface ELO | Tournament | Round | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006/10/02 | Roger Federer | 3088 | 3006 | 6-3 6-3 | Tim Henman | 2740 | 2721 | Tokyo | F | |
2006/08/28 | Roger Federer | 3080 | 2998 | 6-3 6-4 7-5 | Tim Henman | 2730 | 2711 | US Open | R64 | |
2006/06/26 | Roger Federer | 3074 | 2842 | 6-4 6-0 6-2 | Tim Henman | 2739 | 2710 | Wimbledon | R64 | |
2005/03/21 | Roger Federer | 3000 | 2944 | 6-4 6-2 | Tim Henman | 2779 | 2759 | Miami Masters | QF | |
2004/08/30 | Roger Federer | 2950 | 2880 | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Tim Henman | 2789 | 2766 | US Open | SF | |
2004/03/08 | Roger Federer | 2915 | 2867 | 6-3 6-3 | Tim Henman | 2804 | 2774 | Indian Wells Masters | F | |
2004/02/16 | Tim Henman | 2802 | 2774 | 6-3 7-6(9) | Roger Federer | 2896 | 2846 | Rotterdam | QF | |
2003/10/27 | Tim Henman | 2794 | 2770 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Roger Federer | 2850 | 2800 | Paris Masters | QF | |
2002/03/18 | Roger Federer | 2795 | 2759 | 6-2 RET | Tim Henman | 2822 | 2795 | Miami Masters | R16 | |
2001/10/22 | Tim Henman | 2807 | 2778 | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Roger Federer | 2755 | 2732 | Basel | F | |
2001/06/25 | Tim Henman | 2791 | 2704 | 7-5 7-6(6) 2-6 7-6(6) | Roger Federer | 2753 | 2621 | Wimbledon | QF | |
2000/10/09 | Tim Henman | 2792 | 2773 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | Roger Federer | 2656 | 2658 | Vienna | SF | |
1999/10/04 | Tim Henman | 2761 | 2746 | 6-3 7-5 | Roger Federer | 2549 | 2552 | Basel | QF |
Compare historical ELO ratings across different surfaces and time periods
Comparing overall match experience and winning efficiency